Intimate partner violence influences modern family planning use among married women in Tanzania: cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorBaritwa, Mrimi S.
dc.contributor.authorJoho, Angelina A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T04:51:56Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T04:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionFull-text. Available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17666-z
dc.description.abstractBackground Married women who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) are less likely to negotiate with their partners on modern family planning (FP) use. This study aimed to determine the influence of intimate partner violence and sociodemographics on modern family planning use. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Mara region, Tanzania from April to July 2020. A total of 366 married women were interviewed. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Analysis was done using SPSS version 25, and a binary logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors of modern FP use. The significance level was set at a p-value less than 0.05. Results The overall prevalence of IPV was 73% with 54.1% physical, 36.3% psychological, and 25.4%, sexual violence. The prevalence of modern FP use was 62%, and the most (49.1%) common method practiced by married women was injection (Depo Provera). Physical violence (AOR = 0.32, p = 0.0056), and psychological violence (AOR = 0.22, p = 0.0022) had significantly reduced odds of modern FP use. Religion (AOR = 4.6, p = 0.0085), and availability of preferred modern FP methods (AOR = 9.27, p < 0.0001) had significantly increased odds of modern FP use. Conclusion In this study, there is a positive association between the use of modern FP methods and IPV. To prevent IPV and its negative health consequences, it is crucial to involve community leaders and primary healthcare workers. They can help in identifying the best strategies to prevent IPV and promote the use of modern FP methods. It is equally important to involve male partners in reproductive health decisions, including the use of modern FP methods. This approach will help reduce reproductive coercion.
dc.identifier.citationBaritwa, M. S., & Joho, A. A. (2024). Intimate partner violence influences modern family planning use among married women in Tanzania: cross-sectional study. BMC public health, 24(1), 421.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-024-17666-z
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17666-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.udom.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12661/4888
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health
dc.subjectIntimate partner violence (IPV)
dc.subjectModern family planning (FP)
dc.subjectSociodemographics
dc.subjectCross-sectional study
dc.subjectMara region
dc.subjectTanzania
dc.subjectMarried women
dc.subjectStructured questionnaire
dc.subjectSPSS analysis
dc.subjectBinary logistic regression
dc.subjectPhysical violence
dc.subjectPsychological violence
dc.subjectSexual violence
dc.subjectFP methods
dc.subjectDepo Provera
dc.subjectReligion
dc.subjectAvailability of FP methods
dc.subjectCommunity leaders
dc.subjectPrimary healthcare workers
dc.subjectReproductive health decisions
dc.subjectReproductive coercion.
dc.titleIntimate partner violence influences modern family planning use among married women in Tanzania: cross-sectional study
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume24
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mrimi Baritwa,,, Intimate partner violence influences modern.pdf
Size:
1.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections