4 learning as participation: open practices and the production of identities
dc.contributor.author | Bentley, Caitlin M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Reilly, Katherine M. A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Alperin, Juan Pablo | |
dc.contributor.author | Rao, Anuradha | |
dc.contributor.author | Parekh, Priya | |
dc.contributor.author | Traxler, John | |
dc.contributor.author | Ling, Richard | |
dc.contributor.author | Chaudhuri, Bidisha | |
dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, Janaki | |
dc.contributor.author | Hoysala, Onkar | |
dc.contributor.author | Mungai, Paul | |
dc.contributor.author | Belle, Jean-Paul Van | |
dc.contributor.author | Sadoway, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Shekhar, Satyarupa | |
dc.contributor.author | Kendall, Linus | |
dc.contributor.author | Dasgupta, Pernabha | |
dc.contributor.author | Dearden, Andy | |
dc.contributor.author | Walton, Marion | |
dc.contributor.author | Densmore, Melissa | |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, Yingqin | |
dc.contributor.author | Stahl, Bernd | |
dc.contributor.author | Faith, Becky | |
dc.contributor.author | Singh, Parminder Jeet | |
dc.contributor.author | Gurumurthy, Anita | |
dc.contributor.author | Chami, Nandini | |
dc.contributor.author | Gamage, Piyumi | |
dc.contributor.author | Rajapakse, Chiranthi | |
dc.contributor.author | Galpaya, Helani | |
dc.contributor.author | Moshi, Goodiel C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Shao, Deo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-19T07:05:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-19T07:05:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description | Abstract. Full-text chapter available at https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11480.001.0001 | |
dc.description.abstract | For some time, the world has been looking hopefully toward digitally enabled openness to bring about positive transformation and development (Smith, Elder, and Emdon 2011). In this chapter, we unpack this hope and examine the linkages between open initiatives and development. The prefix open conjures up the idea of making digital platforms, knowledge, and knowledge development processes more accessible, including to a hitherto excluded group of people. However, the links between openness, participation, and development are far from automatic, and understanding people's participation in open processes continues to elude researchers and practitioners. Thus, what we need to focus on is not only whether participation occurred but who participated and who was excluded (whether by exercising their choice or systematically). In sum, there is a need to understand how existing micro and institutional power structures shape the dynamics of participation. Moreover, open development cannot afford to focus merely on the outcomes of an intervention and label them a success or failure relative to the goals of that intervention. We need to focus equally on the processes and practices1 by which those outcomes were reached. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bentley, C. M., Reilly, K. M., Alperin, J. P., Rao, A., Parekh, P., Traxler, J., ... & Shao, D. (2020). 4 Learning as Participation: Open Practices and the Production of Identities. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7551/mitpress/11480.003.0007 | |
dc.identifier.other | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11480.001.0001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.udom.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12661/4326 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | MIT Press | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Critical Perspectives on Open Development | |
dc.subject | Open practices | |
dc.subject | 4 learning | |
dc.subject | Knowledge development | |
dc.subject | Digital platforms | |
dc.subject | Digitally enabled openness | |
dc.title | 4 learning as participation: open practices and the production of identities | |
dc.type | Book chapter |