Farmers’ preferences and physical effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures in the east african highlands

dc.contributor.authorTenge, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorSterk, G.
dc.contributor.authorOkoba, B. O.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-30T06:25:54Z
dc.date.available2024-04-30T06:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.descriptionFull text article, Also available at URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Geert-Sterk/publication/284514792_Farmers'_preferences_and_physical_effectiveness_of_soil_and_water_conservation_measures_in_the_East_African_Highlands/links/57e5070508ae22a8914cb99f/Farmers-preferences-and-physical-effectiveness-of-soil-and-water-conservation-measures-in-the-East-African-Highlands.pdf
dc.description.abstractSoil erosion by water is a serious threat to sustainable agricultural production in the East African Highlands. Despite the severity of the soil erosion problem, there is not much quantitative information on the effectiveness of the recommended soil and water conservation (SWC) measures, rendering their planning and adoption difficult. This study was conducted in Kwalei catchment Tanzania to assess the physical effectiveness of bench terraces, grass strips and fanya juu terraces, which are the most important SWC measures used in the East African Highlands. Additional information was collected from Gikuuri catchment in Kenya. Trench ditches (at Gikuuri) and runoff plots (at Kwalei) were used to assess the physical effectiveness, while interviews and group discussions were used to obtain farmers' reasons for preferences of certain SWC measures. The results obtained showed significant effects of the tested SWC measures. Surface runoff and soil loss generally decreased, while soil moisture retention and crop yields improved due to the SWC measures. Fanya juu terraces are the most effective measure in reducing soil and water losses followed by bench terraces and grass strips. However, bench terraces retained more soil moisture and increased maize and bean yields than fanya juu and grass strips. Apart from bio-physical criteria to evaluate SWC measures, farmers have other criteria, which depend on their social and economic situations. Important farmers’ criteria are provision of fodder, fertility improvement and low costs for implementation. To facilitate adoption of SWC measures there is a need for consideration and integration of farmers’ criteria into the planning and design of SWC measures, and implementation of SWC activities. Further research work is recommended for identifying economically feasible SWC measures under different biophysical and socio-economic conditions.
dc.identifier.citationTenge, A. J., Sterk, G., & Okoba, B. O. (2011). Farmers’ preferences and physical effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures in the East African Highlands. Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 84-100.
dc.identifier.otherURL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Geert-Sterk/publication/284514792_Farmers'_preferences_and_physical_effectiveness_of_soil_and_water_conservation_measures_in_the_East_African_Highlands/links/57e5070508ae22a8914cb99f/Farmers-preferences-and-physical-effectiveness-of-soil-and-water-conservation-measures-in-the-East-African-Highlands.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.udom.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12661/4503
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJSS
dc.subjectSoil erosion
dc.subjectsoil and water conservation
dc.subjectphysical effectiveness
dc.subjectfarmer preference
dc.subjectEast African highland
dc.subjectKenya
dc.subjectTanzania
dc.subjectAgriculture production
dc.subjectSoil conservation
dc.subjectWater conservation
dc.titleFarmers’ preferences and physical effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures in the east african highlands
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tenge, A. J..pdf
Size:
612.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections