Tales of accountability: a Q-method study of discourses amongst Tanzanian members of parliament
Loading...
Date
2017
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Abstract
The hallmark of accountability in a democracy centres on the way the elected parliament holds the executive to account. If the parliament does not perform its oversight role effectively, lower authorities would have fewer incentives to do the same vis-à-vis local executives. In this article we therefore ask whether or not different meanings of accountability can be discerned amongst Tanzanian Members of Parliament (MPs). In our Q-method research we found four clearly identifiable discourses on accountability amongst Tanzanian MPs: Partycrats; My Electorate's Advocates; Frustrated Account Holders; and Pragmatic Account Holders. We understand MPs discourses within the broader context of political clientelism and we argue that this combination of discourses, or accountability culture, enables the executive to rule in semi-autocratic ways. Even if opposition parties would obtain a parliamentary majority, this accountability culture stands in the way of achieving greater democratic responsiveness.
Description
Full Text Article. Also available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core.
Keywords
Accountability, Democracy, Parliament, Members of Parliament, MPs, Executive, Semi-autocratic, Political parties
Citation
Katomero, J., Hoppe, R., & Wesselink, A. (2017). Tales of accountability: a Q-method study of discourses amongst Tanzanian members of parliament. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 55(3), 423-453.